Risk info sharing

No, but Anthropic published a short report focused on misuse in influence operations

DeepMind doesn't do this

No, but OpenAI does publish information about misuse attempts and how it tries to disrupt them

Meta doesn't do this

xAI says it "may" report incidents

Microsoft doesn't do this

Anthropic and its leadership sometimes talk about extreme risks, the alignment problem, and especially the prospect of dangerous AI appearing soon

DeepMind's leadership expresses concerns about extreme risks from AI, but Google's does not, and DeepMind and Google themselves never articulate concerns about extreme risks

OpenAI and its leadership used to talk about extreme risks but mostly haven't done so recently, especially catastrophic risks from misaligned AIs

Meta doesn't do this

CEO Elon Musk talks about extreme risks, including risks from misalignment, and how powerful AI might appear soon. xAI itself does not.

Microsoft doesn't do this

Anthropic doesn't do this

DeepMind doesn't do this

OpenAI doesn't do this

Meta doesn't do this

xAI doesn't do this

Microsoft doesn't do this

Anthropic avoids publishing capabilities research on dangerous paths, but details are unclear

DeepMind publishes capabilities research on dangerous paths, but at least it doesn't publish much on its Gemini models

OpenAI avoids publishing capabilities research on dangerous paths but doesn't have a policy on this and hasn't articulated this principle

Meta publishes pretraining research and doesn't plan to stop; see e.g. Llama 3

xAI has not published reports on its models, but it doesn't have a policy on this

Microsoft publishes pretraining research and doesn't plan to stop; see e.g. Phi-4.